SRC

  • All Posts
  • Events

EVENT:

Lorem Ipsum

D

H

M

S

Now Live!

See Details

SUB-SECTIONS

About the SRC

Our History

Vision & Mission

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about the SRC, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-SECTIONS

Our Team

Our Board

Past Directors

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about the SRC, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-SECTIONS

Sir Shridath Ramphal 

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about the SRC, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-PAGES

International Trade Policy

Short Courses

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about the SRC, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-PAGES

SRC Trading Thoughts

Policy Briefs

Quick Guides

Working Papers

CARICOM’s 50th Anniversary

SRC Newsletter

Research

Trade Research

Research Areas

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about the SRC, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-PAGES

SRC Lunchtime Chats

SRC Virtual Research Series

Annual Owen Arthur Memorial Lecture

UWI Tradelab

Trade Blog

Agrilab

COVID-19 & Vaccine Resources

WTO Law Moot Court

Trade-n-Spaces Insights

Media

SRC Youtube Videos

Gallery

SRC Video Gallery

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about the SRC, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-PAGES

CARICOM-Africa Trade

CARICOM-US Trade

Trade and Climate Action

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about the SRC, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-SECTIONS

About

Key Activities

Meet the CSL Team

Fact and Figures

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about CSL, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-SECTIONS

Caribbean Shipping Lanes Reports

IMO-Related Documents

Caribbean Shipping Lanes Blogs

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about CSL, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

SUB-SECTIONS

Regional Workshop on the 2023 IMO GHG Strategy in Belize

Strategic Training on IMO Climate Change-Related Negotiations for CARICOM Maritime Officials

CSL Stakeholder Engagement Workshops

Do you have any questions?

To learn more about CSL, please do not hesitate to reach out to us.

EVENT:

The Caribbean Crucible Discussion Serie…

  • All Posts
  • Events

D

H

M

S

Now Live!

See Details

Home

About Us

Resources

CSL

Contact Us

Main Menu

See About Us

Get to Know SRC

Our Team

Advisory Board

Sir Shridath Ramphal

Main Menu

Resources

Courses

Publications

Outreach

Thematic Areas

Main Menu

See CSL

About the Project

Documents

Blogs

Workshops and Training

Port of Spain, Trinidad. The Caribbean Court of Justice (‘CCJ’) today delivered a judgment which upholds the classification decision of the CARICOM Council for Trade and Economic Development (‘COTED’)  on cement, known as Rock Hard Cement, imported and/or distributed within CARICOM by Rock Hard Distribution Limited, Mootilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Limited and Rock Hard Cement Limited. These proceedings in the CCJ’s Original Jurisdiction mark the finale of complex litigation which has resulted in five separate judgments and numerous orders thus far.

Today’s judgment settled the dispute as to whether Rock Hard Cement ought to be classified as ‘Building cement (grey)’ and be charged a CARICOM  tax of 15% when imported into the region, or as ‘Other hydraulic cement’ in which case a levy of  0-5% would be payable. Earlier this year, COTED decided that Rock Hard Cement was to be classified as ‘Other hydraulic cement’ in line with the advice received from the World Customs Organization’s (‘WCO’) Harmonized System (‘HS’) Committee.

The State of Trinidad and Tobago, Trinidad Cement Limited (‘TCL’) and Arawak Cement Company Limited argued that COTED’s decision-making process was procedurally flawed and that COTED’s reliance on the WCO’s advice went against the economic objectives of the CARICOM tax. On this basis they contended that Rock Hard Cement should be classified as ‘Building cement (grey)’ and be subjected to the 15% tax as Rock Hard Cement was in direct competition with TCL’s regionally produced ‘Building cement (grey)’.

In its judgment, the CCJ upheld the COTED classification decision as being binding on all Member States in keeping with Article 29(1) of the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas (RTC). The Court found that COTED was fully entitled to place heavy reliance upon the WCO advice, given the role of the WCO in harmonizing rules on international trade within the context of the World Trade Organization.

While it upheld the COTED classification decision, the Court also commented that recent developments in the cement industry made it appropriate for a study to be done by COTED to assess whether the tariff rate for imported ‘Other hydraulic cement’ ought to be increased to give additional protection to regional cement manufacturers so that regional cement manufacturers might obtain  an appropriate level of protection. The Court indicated that the conduct of such a study would be entirely in keeping with the CARICOM Treaty obligation on COTED to keep the tariff under review (Article 83 (5) of the RTC). The CCJ also recommended greater collaboration in undertaking global trade commitments, as for example, in their commitments to the World Trade Organization, and it suggested the implementation of a project aimed at harmonizing the classification of goods based on WCO standards in a move to increase CARICOM trade.

This judgment was delivered for the consolidated matters of Trinidad Cement Limited  and The State of Trinidad and Tobago and Rock Hard Distribution Limited and Mootilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Limited (TTOJ2018/001),  Trinidad Cement Limited & Arawak Cement Company Limited and The State of Barbados and Rock Hard Cement Limited (TTOJ2018/002), Rock Hard Cement Limited and The State of Barbados and The Caribbean Community (BBOJ2018/001) and Rock Hard Distribution Limited and The State of Trinidad and Tobago and The Caribbean Community(SLUOJ2018/001).

END